That campaign was won by Britain and her allies in 1814, freeing up these soldiers for North American service.Īnd, the British navy was second to none in the world and would take command of the seas around the U.S., for the duration of the War of 1812, Williams said, with the U.S. The British, on the other hand, had tens of thousands of seasoned veterans, who were fighting Napoleon's Army in Europe. The actual strength was around 5,000 to 6,000 Soldiers. Neimeyer of the Marine Corps University History Department authored the pamphlet.īefore the War of 1812, the regular Army was about 10,000 strong - "on paper," Williams said, meaning units were authorized but men would still need to be recruited and trained for them. Williams edited a pamphlet, "The Chesapeake Campaign," which will be available in print or online by the middle of next month at. Army, given the circumstances prior to June 1812, when the war started, according to Glenn Williams, U.S. This largely forgotten war, however, was by-in-large a success for the U.S.
WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Aug, 27, 2014) - The failure to capture Canada, the retreat at Bladensburg, and the burning of the capitol 200 years ago this week are part of what people generally remember about the War of 1812, according to an Army historian.
0 kommentar(er)
